Intel FTC - Statement From Mike Bruzzone FTC TA Operating in Civic Service Capacity. Intel Docket 9341

Intel FTC

"" September 7, 2010

To: Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

Fm: Mike Bruzzone
Camp Marketing
FTC TA Operating in Civic Service Capacity

Re: FTC v Intel Docket 9341 Public Comment
Nation Interest Publication version 3.12

Here's my FTC v Intel 9341 public comment.

You may have noticed Intel, and the Intel Communications herd, quickly followed August 4, 2010 FTC announcement of finalizing 9341 Proposed consent agreement . . . as the confirmed settlement.

Which of course is not true pending Commissioner public comment review, and then potential ratification of proposed consent agreement in all or part.

I believe the consent agreement will be accepted in part and denied in part.

Honest, even for me from industry, I have never witnessed Intel comms spreading so much disinformation so quickly on August 4.

Also believe Senate and Congressional Committee's on Commerce are watching this outcome; as a potential regulatory breakdown. We'll get to see just how with it, or out of it, Wash DC is with this outcome. We know it bad . . . but can it show worse?

If the proposal is not accepted . . . that is a hopeful indicator toward governance & regulatory fiduciary responsibility

Obviously the FTC had a hand in this misrepresented settlement pitch. A little premature for Chairman Leibowtiz, Counsel Brill and Bureau of Competition Director Feinstein to be swept up with Intel Network to position the matter as settled . . . when in fact settlement is pending Commissioner ratification and they all know this . . .

There's an FTC video of the August 4 proposed consent agreement press conference . . . and oh was that an Intel celebration.

Perhaps the Chairman is a little bite more cunning?

Perhaps Intel Network and comms herd are about to experience a severe conceptual discontinuity; Commissioner non acceptance of consent order as proposed.

That would be fateful twist.

And I would think spark the legitimate press to lead in legitimate counterpoint response.

Mike Bruzzone

Summary Overview of 9341 proposed consent agreement; attached in full:

That entering into Bureau of Competition Docket 9341 proposed consent agreement with Intel Corporation would enable continued monopolization and non address of standing violations of Federal Law including antitrust, commerce and trade, racketeering, penal and securities law by the Federal Trade Commission.

Proposed consent agreement should be partially accepted for plaintiff sales relief and partially denied for antitrust omissions.

Chartered to act under the laws of the Unites States Bureau of Competition Docket 9341 negotiated settlement proposal in current form is insufficient on antitrust environmental circumstances of fact, discovery, law precedent and Commission fiduciary responsibilities.

And should be sent back to the negotiating table where the future of democratic capitalism and civil society are truly at stake.

We cannot overlook all the major Intel Network System crimes or the fiduciary and governance breakdowns which proposed order omits.

Including seven of the most hideous system crime categories;

1) Vertical by horizontal tying.

2) Intel multiple laterals of combination.

3) Intel tied charge through channels metering devices.

4) Intel Corporate plus Media tied sales attraction.

5) Network political & jurist multipoint and consumer manipulations.

6) Intel Insider Quanda stock and market rigging systems.

7) Microsoft OS horizontally tied by OEM license to Intel below cost product.

These seven categories of Intel systems deliver debilitating tendencies.

System, social, and financial consequence’s on competition, enterprise, industry, regulatory, law enforcement and protection, political body, Nation’s stability, financial markets and capital creation potential.

And continue to perpetuate hurdles in the way of system remedies from over 18 years of not owing up to many Intel and Microsoft Antitrust Violations, and concealing PC Media system crimes that have destroyed industries, competition and legitimate governance functions.

Accordingly back too the negotiating table. Docket 9341 should proceed too FTC hearing stage focused on Sherman Act Section 1 and 2 per se condemnations of law known under Section 5 umbrella which is Docket 9341.

FTC Focus -

1) Competitor limiting by vertical restraints for multiple laterals of combination.

2) Limited by horizontal contract in combinations including conspiracy to conceal.

3) In combinations cartel routing & price fixing raising consumer PC price by 6%.

4) In combinations monopoly price impact on consumers from media manipulation.

5) Validate recovery for consumer monopoly price, routing & price fixing harms.

Finally, for Docket 9341 in hearing too verify the criminal components of these competition case matters in proceeding transcript for Department of Justice timely follow on complaint;

DOJ Focus -

1) Recovering consumer monopoly price, product routing and price fixing harms.

2) Prosecuting competition, commercial frauds and racketeering that are criminal

components of the FTC Docket 9341 competition case violation’s themselves.

SEC Focus –

1) Documenting Accounting Fraud and with DOJ prosecuting Stock Market Rig.

In Summary -

Any ruling away from complete documentation of Docket 9341 case facts, in open proceedings, would deny the United States, American People, elected representatives in Congress and Senate the knowledge reference to act on the complete set of case facts.

Complete assessment of proposed order and included oversight clauses attached.

Regards,

Mike Bruzzone
Camp Marketing Consultancy ""

Commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission - In the Matter of Intel Corporation FTC Docket 9341

See Link Below for More Information
http://www.ceopaulotellini.com/2010/09/commissioners-of-federal-trade.html

www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
my Blog on Intel Corruption

Intel FTC

FTC 9341