SEC, U.S. Senate, Congressional Committees, State Attorney Generals, U.S. Attorneys, FTC have ALL been Notified of Intel Corps. Crimes.
"" Consumer Recovery Subset 2; Monopoly Price Premiums -
The remaining 15% consumer subset recovery of $3.785 billion is associated with personal computer end buyers paying a monopoly price premium on some Intel PC purchases.
That percent of product, one Intel product generation to the next, where consumers paid a monopoly price for the microprocessor above the monopoly competitive or equilibrium price. Which means computer’s containing the latest and greatest Intel microprocessors.
Computer’s featuring the highest speed, or most microprocessor cores, or the highest combination of performance and power savings in a notebook model. Microprocessors typically offered in the high performance computer brand models within Intel Dealer PC product lines. But can also be associated with computers containing Intel value priced microprocessors.
$3.785 billion dollar sum is conservative and advantages Intel on analysis which uses average price on quantities. Using preferred average weighted price across product types, the monopoly price premium can grow.
Infra marginal product, that which Intel makes least of and charges most for, offers highest end buyer recovery potential for these small short lots of monopoly priced microprocessors.
Product associated with Intel new microprocessor and new PC product introductions displaying patterns of 1st degree price discrimination, exclusive dealing, the raising of microprocessor price following predatory price moves designed to monopolize markets and to stop channel sales flows of competitor’s products.
Competitors include x86 microprocessor horizontal competitors including AMD, chip set & graphic vertical rivals and compliments, like VIA and nVidia, other x86 and inter platform computers and some PC platform replacements.
One of the consumer monopoly price premium examples -
Below find partial economic analysis from the Intel Planned Economy; Pentium 3 risk production code name Katmai, 0.25 micron lithography, 450 to 600 MHz clock speeds.
Katmai average weighted price is calculated on Intel 1,000 piece price and Micro Design Resource quantities on speed splits.
Micro Design Resource quantity estimates are long time and widely accepted by technology, finance and media industries who are Intel customers, stake holders and stockholders.
MDR Estimates are in fact the intra industry regulator itself, that was made into an inter industry sales game by Intel Network.
For Katmai, economic analysis below reveals $300,990,000 in consumer loss from paying a monopoly price greater than $450 for first quarter’s production of 1,905,000 units.
Monopoly competitive equilibrium price is $363 which suggests a monopoly deadweight cost of up to $400,106,000 on second quarter production of 5,438,000 units.
Run down quantities are less than $363, with end of run quantities priced $262 down to $178; are between average total and average fixed costs.
No below fixed cost production is recorded for this specific desktop microprocessor short run. Although quantity and revenue difference in analyst and MDR Intel estimated shut down points are raised.
Foremost, consumer monopoly price premium of $300,900,000 and $764,517,480 in Intel Inside charge back values are recorded. Charge back values represent matching halves of the Intel and PC Dealer tie passed through to Media Sales Agents.
In this estimate at 3% each on Intel total production revenue’s of $12,741,958,000. The specific percentage pass through value is defined contractually within the Intel Inside contract agreement between Intel, Dealers and Media Sales Agents.
An evolutionary series of guidelines concerning tied charge back I’ve encouraged FTC to discovery for a decade now.
Katmai analysis is not a proof, but a pointer to two consumer losses totaling $1,065,417,480 for FTC Docket 9341 discovery.
Findings from this analyst are passed on by FTC to Intel, for Intel rebuttal. So what has FTC learned from Intel’s document production in rebuttal?
Consumer Recovery Time Frame
$3.785 billion consumer monopoly price recovery is calculated on Intel product runs occurring between January 1, 1999 and July 2004.
The analysis is undergoing a third evolution of refinement.
For FTC Docket 9341 review period, additionally, six years of Intel production estimates are currently missing from this specific analysis. Both the existing and remaining
production and price data require FTC and or DOJ discovery from Intel for validation as a monopoly proof.
RICO; specifically Cross Enterprise, cross profession network driven markets rigging is proven regardless. Proven on structure and directly witnessed conduct.
Industrial Subset 3
Industrial subset is estimated principally on Micro Design Resource estimates of Intel product short runs; estimated quarterly quantities at Intel stated price in period, cross referred against Intel average total cost, average fixed cost, variable cost determined on Intel financials.
Finally, the marginal cost estimate to produce a single microprocessor from economic analysis cross checked with variable cost from Intel Financials.
Classic economics analysis is used because classic era rules appear to offer the foundation of Intel’s economic technology until Pentium M 2005 product segmentation phase.
In decomposing Intel systems structure academic theory of the 1930s through 1970s is insightful. This key for decomposing Intel systems theory appears established using similar texts that Messrs.
Moore, Grove, Barrett and other executives might have been taught, as the syllabus of FTC primary and secondary case research documents. Although practiced on a slightly more sophisticated level then solely running the neighborhood breakfast shop or determining the customer demand for egg dishes. Intel system mechanics appear to be designed by engineers and system theorists.
Economic Calculations
Five primary calculations are used in Intel Economic Analysis Decomposing a cost based quantitative mathematical model relied on by inside traders for playing the Intel stock price.
Price multiplied by quantities to determine quarterly revenue and change in revenue.
Change in price and quantities to determine price elasticity.
For a cost based model, change in revenue (suspect as change in total cost), divided by change in total quantity for estimating marginal cost average.
The result can correlate with variable cost cross check from financials. Change in revenue (suspect as cost) divided by change in quantity suspect at Marginal Revenue Approximation.
Actually an indicator of Intel Product Stocks .. ""
Full Document and Source:
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
on Top of Site...
Information by
Mike Bruzzone
Intel Case Technical Analysis since 1996
Camp Marketing Consultancy
the Point: Intel Corp. is Lying - Cheating and Stealing and if your a Shareholder, Consumer, Taxpayer.... WELL you are Paying the Price.
Do you have a Tip on Intel Insider Trading, Corruption, RICO Complaints, Flat OUT Fraud, Intel Bullying, Intel Corp. forcing Economic Terrorism onto you or your Company? Email your Tips - Documents - Videos to me, Crystal L. Cox ~ Investigative Blogger - Crystal@CrystalCox.com
No comments:
Post a Comment